V. Alfaro et al., Multiple inert gas elimination technique for determining ventilation/perfusion distributions in rat during normoxia, hypoxia and hyperoxia, CLIN EXP PH, 28(5-6), 2001, pp. 419-424
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY
1. The use of the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) in quant
ifying ventilation/perfusion distributions ((V) over dot A/(Q) over dot) in
small animals, such as the rat, may cause results to be biased due to haem
odilution produced by the large volume of liquid infused intravenously.
2. We tested two methods of administering inert gases in rats using the MIG
ET: (i) standard continuous intravenous administration of inert gases (meth
od A); and (ii) a new method based on the physicochemical properties of eac
h inert gas (method B). This method included acute simultaneous inert gas a
dministration using three pathways: inhalation, intravenous infusion and re
ctal infusion. Both MIGET methods were applied to obtain data while breathi
ng three different inspiratory fractions of oxygen (F-IO2): normoxia, hypox
ia and hyperoxia.
3. Inert gas levels obtained from blood or expired air samples were suffici
ent for chromatographic measurement, at least during a 2 h period. The (V)
over dot A/(Q) over dot distributions reported using both methods were acce
ptable for all the physiological conditions studied; therefore, the alterna
tive method used here may be useful in further MIGET studies in rats becaus
e haemodilution resulting from continuous intravenous infusion of less-solu
ble gases can be avoided.
4. Normoxic rats showed lower mean values of the (V) over dot A/(Q) over do
t ratio of ventilation distribution and higher mean values of the (V) over
dot A/(Q) over dot ratio of perfusion distribution with the usual method of
inert gas administration (method A). These non-significant differences wer
e observed under almost all physiological conditions studied and they could
be caused by haemodilution. Nevertheless, the effect of interindividual di
fferences cannot be discarded. An additional effect of the low haematocrit
on cardiovascular changes due to low FIO2, such as pulmonary vasoconstricti
on or increased cardiac output, may explain the lower dispersion of perfusi
on distributions found in group A during hypoxia.