A. Portoles et al., Comparative single-dose bioavailability study of two oral formulations of ibuprofen in healthy volunteers, CLIN DRUG I, 21(5), 2001, pp. 383-389
Objective: To compare the bioavailability of equivalent doses of two oral f
ormulations of ibuprofen: ibuprofen lysinate 1025mg (powder for oral suspen
sion) and ibuprofen free acid 600mg (effervescent granules).
Design and Setting: Nonblind, comparative, two-way, crossover, randomised d
esign carried out in a phase I study unit.
Participants: 24 healthy volunteers (10 males, 14 females) with mean age 23
.42 years, mean bodyweight 65.38kg, mean height 170.75cm and mean body mass
index 22.31 kg/m(2)
Interventions: During each study period, a single oral dose of one of the f
ormulations was administered, and 15 plasma samples were obtained to determ
ine ibuprofen concentrations and calculate kinetic parameters.
Results: The kinetic parameters [ibuprofen lysinate vs ibuprofen free acid
(mean +/- SD)] were: area under the concentration-time curve from zero to i
nfinity (AUC(0-infinity)) 181.64 +/- 64.84 vs 176.99 +/- 62.35 mg.h/L; maxi
mum plasma concentration (C-max) 62.03 +/- 9.66 vs 51.39 +/- 12.84 mg/L; ti
me to reach Cmax (t(max)) [median] 0.54 vs 1.75h. The 90% confidence interv
als (CIs) of the ratios of logarithmically transformed values were 98.05 to
107.79% for AUC(0-infinity) and 112.87 to 137.07% for C-max; the 90% CI of
the difference in t(max) was -1.5 to -1.0h.
Conclusions: The extent of ibuprofen absorption is the same with both formu
lations. The speed of release/absorption is greater with the lysinate formu
lation. This is of particular significance for achieving a rapid analgesic
or antipyretic.