Muscle strength, pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis

Citation
Mpm. Steultjens et al., Muscle strength, pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis, CLIN REHAB, 15(3), 2001, pp. 331-341
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
331 - 341
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(200106)15:3<331:MSPADI>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objective: Reduced muscle strength is regarded as a risk factor for pain an d disability in osteoarthritis (OA). Currently, various indices for muscle strength are used when assessing determinants of pain and disability. The g oal of the present study was to evaluate these indices of muscle strength. Design: Isometric muscle strength was measured for 16 muscle actions around the knees and hips in 52 patients with OA of the hip and 70 patients with OA of the knee. Various indices of muscle strength were derived from these measurements, applying five alternative approaches. These approaches ranged from a single overall index to a set of 16 separate indices. The internal consistency of these indices was determined (Cronbach's alpha), and it was determined to what extent they could reveal the association between reduced muscle strength on the one hand and pain and disability on the other hand. Results: Internal consistency was satisfactory for all indices (Cronbach's alpha >0.74). As expected, reduced muscle strength was associated with incr eased disability, but no clear relationship could be established between mu scle weakness and pain. The strength of these associations did not depend o n the approach used to derive the indices for muscle strength. Conclusions: The indices did not show major differences with regard to inte rnal consistency or the extent to which the association with pain and disab ility could be revealed. For reasons of parsimony, approaches resulting in few indices appear to be most useful. However, muscle strength was found to be significantly reduced around affected joints, compared with muscle stre ngth around unaffected joints. Therefore, the most suitable approach for re ducing muscle strength data into indices is one that results in as few indi ces as possible, but with separate indices for muscle strength around affec ted and unaffected joints.