This article argues that political gridlock in Korea was responsible for th
e defeat of many economic reform efforts before the economic crisis. Succes
sful and timely economic reforms would have made the Korean economy less vu
lnerable to the economic crisis. The persistence of political gridlock can
be attributed to the immature or unconsolidated nature of Korean democracy,
including weak democratic institutions and traditional political values an
d practices. With a model of policy gridlock in the context of the Korean d
ecision-making process, the article attempts to link Korean political cultu
re and institutions to the occurrence of policy gridlock.