Objective The diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) is based on the responsiven
ess of the enteropathy to a gluten-free diet (GFD). This implies that terms
such as 'non-responsive CD' and 'refractory CD' are almost paradoxical. In
spite of this, these terms are commonly used in the literature, often with
different and confusing meanings.
Methods On the basis of both a review of the literature and our clinical ex
perience, we propose the following classification, A condition characterize
d by a refractory enteropathy, not due to lymphoma, ulcerative jejunoileiti
s or collagenous sprue, but in which gluten sensitivity has been shown prev
iously or could be shown while the patients were on an immunosuppressive th
erapy should be indicated as refractory CD. Those patients in whom gluten s
ensitivity can be excluded should be considered to be affected by non-coeli
ac refractory sprue. Finally, patients in whom the presence of CD cannot be
either confirmed or excluded should be considered to be affected by undefi
ned sprue.
Results Twenty-four certain refractory patients are described in the litera
ture. The data suggest a diagnosis of refractory CD in 13 patients, non-coe
liac refractory sprue in three patients, and undefined sprue in eight patie
nts.
Conclusions We define refractory CD as a form of CD that no longer responds
to a GFD. Non-coeliac refractory sprue is a condition unrelated to CD. It
could be either an independent condition or a common end point of different
enteropathies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1 3:561-565 (C) 2001 Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.