Proportional positive airway pressure (PPAP) was designed to optimize airwa
y pressure for the therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In a randomiz
ed crossover prospective study, the clinical feasibility of PPAP and its im
mediate effects on the breathing disorder and sleep in comparison with cont
inuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was evaluated. Twelve patients requi
ring CPAP therapy underwent CPAP and PPAP titration in a random order.
Obstructive and mixed respiratory events could be completely abolished with
both forms of treatment. This efficacy could be achieved at a significantl
y lower mean mask pressure during PPAP titration (8.45 +/-2.42 cmH(2)O) com
pared to CPAP (9.96 +/-2.7 cmH(2)O) (p=0.002). The mean minimal arterial ox
ygen saturation (Sa,O-2) (82.8 +/-6.5%) on the diagnostic night increased s
ignificantly (p <0.001) to an average Sa,O-2 of 93.35 +/-1.71% and 93.19 +/
-2.9% during CPAP and PPAP titration. Total sleep time, slow wave sleep and
rapid eye movement (REM) sleep increased significantly by the same amount
during both CPAP and PPAP titration (p<0.001), while sleep stage nonrapid e
ye movement (NREM) 1 and 2 decreased. Six patients preferred the PPAP titra
tion night, four patients did not have a preference, and two patients prefe
rred CPAP.
The present data show that proportional positive airway pressure is as effe
ctive as continuous positive airway pressure in eliminating obstructive eve
nts and has the same immediate effect on sleep. The lower average mask pres
sure during proportional positive airway pressure implies potential advanta
ges compared to continuous positive airway pressure. Proportional positive
airway pressure presents a new effective therapeutic approach to obstructiv
e sleep apnoea.