Amygdala, hippocampus, and unconditioned fear

Citation
Ea. Antoniadis et Rj. Mcdonald, Amygdala, hippocampus, and unconditioned fear, EXP BRAIN R, 138(2), 2001, pp. 200-209
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00144819 → ACNP
Volume
138
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
200 - 209
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-4819(200105)138:2<200:AHAUF>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Embedded within contemporary views of emotional learning is a well-founded agreement that the amygdala plays a pivotal role in the formation and conso lidation of aversive memories formed during fear conditioning. However, it is important to determine whether observed deficits are reflective of a mem ory impairment or whether they are simply attributable to a deficit in the performance of unconditioned fear responses such as freezing. Within the ne urobiology of learning and memory literature, there is an ongoing debate co ncerning the potential role of the amygdala in the performance of unconditi oned fear responses. A view put forth by Vazdarjanova and McGaugh (1998) su ggests that the amygdala is not required for the formation and consolidatio n of the aversive memories formed during fear conditioning, but is essentia l in the performance of unconditioned fear responses. Data provided by Mare n (1999) counter this view by positing that the amygdala is not required fo r the performance of fear responses, but its role is of a mnemonic nature i n the conditioning of fear to neutral cues. To clarify the amygdala's parti cipation in these two processes, a useful approach would involve a situatio n where animals with amygdala damage were examined for their unconditioned fear responses in reaction to footshock as well as the conditioning of thes e reactions to previously neutral cues paired with the aversive event. We h ave previously reported that rats with amygdala or hippocampal damage are i mpaired in discriminative fear conditioning to context. In the present expe riment, we report the initial unconditioned fear responses to footshock by these same animals as well as the conditioned responses during testing. In both groups, the fear responses assessed (freezing, urination, defecation, and locomotion) were not impaired and did not differ from those expressed b y the sham animals. The impairment of discriminative fear conditioning to c ontext, in combination with the present experiment, represents a dissociati on where damage to specific memory structures (amygdala or hippocampus) deb ilitates the mnemonic processes involved in fear conditioning, but not the performance of the fear responses per se.