THE PATIENT-SPECIFIC INDEX - ASKING PATIENTS WHAT THEY WANT

Citation
Jg. Wright et Nl. Young, THE PATIENT-SPECIFIC INDEX - ASKING PATIENTS WHAT THEY WANT, Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 79A(7), 1997, pp. 974-983
Citations number
69
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,Surgery
ISSN journal
00219355
Volume
79A
Issue
7
Year of publication
1997
Pages
974 - 983
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9355(1997)79A:7<974:TPI-AP>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The Patient-Specific Index is used to assess the outcome of total hip arthroplasty bg evaluating the preferences of the individual patient, The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of this index and to compare different methods of c ombining patients' ratings of the severity and importance of their com plaints, to obtain Patient-Specific Index summary scores. All patients who were scheduled to have a total hip arthroplasty performed by one surgeon at a single institution were eligible for the study The patien ts completed the Harris hip score form, the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis (MACTAR) Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, the Short Form- 36, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC), and the Patient-Specific Index. With use of the Patient-Specif ic Index, patients rated the severity and importance of each complaint , These ratings were summed in four different ways to derive severity- importance scores. The questionnaires mere completed twice (two weeks apart) before the total hip arthroplasty and twice (two weeks apart) s ix months after the total hip arthroplasty by a subset of the patients , The seventy-eight participating patients had a mean age of 62.2 year s (range, twenty-five to eighty-seven years) at the time of the operat ion, Forty-three patients (55 per cent) were men, and sixty-three (81 per cent) had osteoarthrosis. The inter-rater and intra-rater test-ret est random-effects intraclass correlation coefficients of the Patient- Specific Index were 0.77 or greater (greater than 0.75 is considered e xcellent), Construct validity was shown by correlations of the Patient -Specific Index with other scales, The additive versions of the Patien t-Specific Index (with a responsiveness statistic of 3.3 or greater an d a standardized response mean of 1.6 or greater) were more responsive than the other scales. We concluded that the Patient-Specific Index i s reliable, valid, and responsive, The additive versions were the most responsive and are recommended for future applications, Such indices need to be tested in studies of patients who have osteoarthrosis of th e hip and other musculoskeletal diseases, to ensure generalizability o f the results.