Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination compared with losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension
X. Chanudet et M. De Champvallins, Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination compared with losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension, INT J CL PR, 55(4), 2001, pp. 233-239
The aim of the study was to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and tole
rability of the low-dose combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme i
nhibitor perindopril 2 mg plus the diuretic indapamide 0.625 mg (P/I) compa
red with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan 50 mg (L50) in the treatmen
t of essential hypertension. Patients (n=277) were randomised, double-blind
and allocated to receive either PII or L50 once daily for a period of 12 w
eeks. Responder and normalisation rates in the two groups were compared by
a chi(2) test. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring results were compared u
sing the one-tailed Student's t-test. Normalisation rates were significantl
y greater in the P/I group (76.0%) than in the L50 group (60.0%) (p=0.009).
Responder rates were significantly higher in the PII group (91.7%) than in
the L50 group (81.8%) (p=0.025), The average blood pressure reductions wer
e: in sSBP (P/I-L50 = -2.4 mmHg; Cl: 6.2; 1.3) and sDBP (P/I-L50 = -2.0 mmH
g; Cl: -4.2; 0.2), The average night-time SEP decrease (ABPM) was significa
ntly greater in the PII group (p=0.041). The tolerability was comparable be
tween the two groups in terms of emergent adverse events related to treatme
nt (12.4% for P/I patients and 8.4% for L50 patients). Laboratory evaluatio
ns did not show any significant variations. It was concluded the low-dose P
/I combination had significantly higher responder and normalisation rates t
han L50. This study also confirmed the good tolerability of both treatments
.