Ka. Matthews et al., Body mass index in mid-life women: relative influence of menopause, hormone use, and ethnicity, INT J OBES, 25(6), 2001, pp. 863-873
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative influence of menopausal status and hormon
e use on body mass index (BMI) among a multiethnic sample of mid-life women
.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey conducted at seven sites where eac
h site targeted an ethnic minority group and Caucasians as part of Study of
Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).
SUBJECTS: A total of 7181 Caucasians, 3949 African-Americans, 1660 Hispanic
s, 562 Chinese Americans, and 803 Japanese Americans between ages of 40 and
55 y residing in or near Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, Newark, Nj
, Oakland, CA, and Pittsburgh, PA.
MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported BMI based on weight in kg divided by height in
m(2) menopausal status, physical inactivity, postmenopausal hormone use, et
hnicity, and age in years.
RESULTS: Compared to premenopausal women (covariate adjusted M = 27.3), wom
en reporting a surgical menopause (M = 28.2) or being in the perimenopausal
transition (M = 27.7 for early and 27.9 for late perimenopause) had higher
BMI. Women reporting a natural menopause (M = 27.4) did not have a higher
BMI than premenopausal women, after adjusting for chronological age and oth
er covariates. Hormone use was associated with lower BMI (M = 26.5 vs 27.3)
. A comparison of effect sizes showed that menopausal status (F = 13.1), fo
llowed by chronological age (F = 24.0), were the least powerful predictors
of BMI, whereas the more powerful predictors were physical activity level (
F = 1377.1) and ethnicity (F = 400.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The menopausal transition affects body mass index in mid-life,
but the effect is small relative to other influences. Interventions to inc
rease physical activity are highly recommended to prevent increases in adip
osity common in mid-life.