Validation of the COSMED K4 b(2) portable metabolic system

Citation
Je. Mclaughlin et al., Validation of the COSMED K4 b(2) portable metabolic system, INT J SP M, 22(4), 2001, pp. 280-284
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01724622 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
280 - 284
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-4622(200105)22:4<280:VOTCKB>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b(2) portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consum ption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), minute ventilation (V-2), an d respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power out puts of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P >0.05) w ere observed in VO2 between the K4 b(2) and DB at rest and at 250 W. Though the K4 b(2) values were significantly higher (P <0.05) than DB values at 5 0, 100, 150, and 200 W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088 , 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L x min(-1), respectively). VCO2 and V-E values f rom the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250 W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150W. The slight overestimation of VO2 (50-200 W) combined with the underestimation of VCO2 (200 and 250 W) by the K4 b(2) resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b(2) portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.