1. It is commonly accepted that many adaptations characterize carnivores th
at live in water. However, no comparative tests have ever shown systematic
differences between aquatic and terrestrial carnivore species as a whole. W
e examine numerous hypotheses that purport to distinguish aquatic and terre
strial carnivores using 20 morphological, life history, physiological and e
cological traits.
2. Using the method of independent contrasts with a complete species-level
phylogeny of extant carnivores, we found few differences between aquatic an
d terrestrial species. Compared to terrestrial sister taxa, aquatic carnivo
res are streamlined (increased head and body length for a given body weight
), have larger brains, smaller litter sizes, shorter interbirth intervals,
and shorter lifespans.
3. Some of these differences are important functionally. Larger brain size
may be related to increased cognitive and sensory needs required for an amp
hibious lifestyle; smaller litters are likely associated with increased neo
natal survival amidst competition for suitable breeding sites and advantage
s accruing to increased precociality.
4. We conclude that broad differentiation of carnivores into aquatic and te
rrestrial ecotypes is not useful given that adaptive differences between th
ese groups are limited and seemingly no more numerous than those that occur
within each ecological group.