Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age - A prospective, randomised study

Citation
Nk. Makwana et al., Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age - A prospective, randomised study, J BONE-BR V, 83B(4), 2001, pp. 525-529
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
ISSN journal
0301620X → ACNP
Volume
83B
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
525 - 529
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-620X(200105)83B:4<525:CVOTFD>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Forty-seven patients over the age of 55 years with a displaced fracture of the ankle were entered into a prospective, randomised study in order to com pare open reduction and internal fixation with closed treatment in a plaste r cast; 36 were reviewed after a mean of 27 months. The outcome was assesse d clinically, radiologically and functionally using the Olerud score. The results showed that anatomical reduction was significantly less reliabl e (p = 0.03) and loss of reduction significantly more common (p = 0.001) in the group with closed treatment, Those managed by open reduction and inter nal fixation had a significantly higher functional outcome score (p = 0.03) and a significantly better range of movement of the ankle (p = 0.044) at r eview.