The purpose of this study was to compare the regional bond strengths of C&B
Metabond resin to root canal dentin, with or without treatment using a eug
enol-containing endodontic sealer liquid. Eighteen extracted human canines
were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction with a slow speed saw. The a
pical third of the root was removed leaving the cervical and middle dentin.
The canal space was then enlarged with files, Gates-Glidden burs, and para
post drills. The teeth were ground on either the mesial or distal sides, pe
rmitting direct access to the entire canal. The cervical or middle third de
ntin was treated with Kerr Root Canal Sealer liquid, alternating between th
e middle and cervical thirds. Each tooth served as its own control. The adh
esive resin was then luted directly to the prepared canal. Specimens, 1 x 1
x 8 mm, were prepared and mounted to a Vitrodyne testing machine enabling
microtensile bond strengths to be measured. Data were analyzed using a two-
way ANOVA and the least squares means test. The mean microtensile bond stre
ngths for the cervical and middle third dentin treated with eugenol were 13
.6 +/- 6.1 MPa (n = 33) and 14.8 +/- 3.9 MPa (n = 29), respectively. Withou
t the eugenol, the mean bond strengths were 18.1 +/- 6.0 MPa (n = 31) and 1
7.3 +/- 4.6 MPa (n = 31) for the cervical and middle sections. The specimen
s treated with the eugenol liquid had significantly lower bond strengths th
an those without eugenol (p < 0.05) only in the cervical third. The region
of the tooth tested had no effect on bond strength. That is, bond strength
of the cervical third was not significantly different from bond strength on
the middle third in either of the two groups (with or without eugenol) tes
ted.