THE INFLUENCE OF GEOMETRIC MISMATCH BETWEEN THE NATIVE AORTIC, NATIVEPULMONARY AND HOMOGRAFT PULMONARY VALVE ON THE RESULTS OF THE PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT OPERATION
Ca. Botha et al., THE INFLUENCE OF GEOMETRIC MISMATCH BETWEEN THE NATIVE AORTIC, NATIVEPULMONARY AND HOMOGRAFT PULMONARY VALVE ON THE RESULTS OF THE PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT OPERATION, Journal of heart valve disease, 6(4), 1997, pp. 355-360
Background: The pulmonary autograft operation has achieved broad accep
tance and may be the ideal aortic valve substitute. Both the pulmonary
autograft and the aortic homograft are more complicated procedures th
an prosthetic valve replacement. The trend to insert the pulmonary aut
ograft as a root replacement rather than in the subcoronary position h
as achieved greater uniformity in the results, but there is still conf
using diversity in opinions on technical details and anatomical dimens
ions. The importance of both size and shape mismatches between the thr
ee valves involved has received little attention. The valves often dif
fer in diameter and in the shape of the recipient aortic annulus. This
uncertainty and the diversity of opinions on essential technical deta
ils was disconcerting when we proceeded from aortic homograft-to-pulmo
nary autograft operations, this was compounded by only a single homogr
aft being available for every operation as we have no homograft bank.
Methods: We compared the hemodynamic results regarding various geometr
ic mismatches. All operative details were the same and patients were s
tudied at regular intervals. Comparisons were made in patients with mi
smatch between recipient aortic annulus and pulmonary autograft. Patie
nts with a normal tricuspid aortic annulus were compared to those with
either a circular redo prosthetic valve annulus or a bicuspid recipie
nt annulus. Thirdly we compared the patients with plication of the aor
tic annulus to those with remodeling of the distal aorta. Lastly we co
mpared mismatch between donor homograft and pulmonary autograft.Result
s: No influence of geometric mismatch between the three valves could b
e found on the results of the pulmonary autograft operation. Conclusio
n: Good results are obtainable without a painful learning curve if one
keeps to certain surgical principles. It need not be a complicated op
eration and geometric mismatches between the three valves involved may
be compensated for adequately.