B. Bone et al., DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF MAMMOGRAPHY AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING IN 238 HISTOLOGICALLY VERIFIED BREAST-LESIONS, Acta radiologica, 38(4), 1997, pp. 489-496
Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray mammogr
aphy and of MR imaging in 238 consecutively operated breasts, and to c
orrelate the findings to histopathological diagnosis. Material and Met
hods: Over 15 months, 220 patients scheduled for breast surgery were e
xamined consecutively, before surgery, by means of both mammography an
d MR imaging. Of the 220 patients, 18 underwent bilateral breast surge
ry. The entire breast was examined by means of T1-weighted transversal
images using a 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. One pre- and
2 post-contrast scans were performed. Each breast was examined by mean
s of mammography and 3 views were applied as routine. All palpable and
mammographically suspect lesions were examined on additional images a
s microfocus magnification or spot compression. The two methods were e
valuated independently of each other. Results: In total, 145 malignant
and 93 benign lesions were found at histopathological examination. Th
e sensitivity of mammography was 89% and MR imaging 92%. The specifici
ty was 72% in both methods. When the results of the 2 methods were com
bined, a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 55% was achieved. Con
clusion: Mammography and MR imaging seemed to complement each other to
produce a high sensitivity. Unfortunately it is impossible at present
to supplement mammography with MR imaging in each patient as a routin
e owing to the current technical and financial limitations.