This paper examines strategic behavior of developers who, through offering
different congested public-good packages and revenue/fiscal schemes, compet
e for residents who are differentiated by income. There is an endogenous de
termination of numbers and sizes of communities. Developers have an incenti
ve to strongly differentiate their public-good offerings. In terms of prici
ng strategies, developers exhibit sharply contrasting behaviors. In low-inc
ome communities, housing consumption is subsidized once lots are priced. In
high-income communities housing consumption is generally taxed.