We present a joint study of the U.S, structural transformation (the decline
of agriculture as the dominating sector) and regional convergence (of sout
hern to northern average wages), We find empirically that most of the regio
nal convergence is attributable to the structural transformation: the natio
nwide convergence of agricultural wages to nonagricultural wages and the fa
ster rate of transition of the southern labor force from agricultural to no
nagricultural jobs. Similar results describe the Midwest's catch-up to the
Northeast (but not the relative experience of the West). To explain these o
bservations, we construct a model in which the South (Midwest) has a compar
ative advantage in producing unskilled labor-intensive agricultural goods.
Thus it starts with a disproportionate share of the unskilled labor force a
nd lower per capita incomes. Over time, declining education/training costs
induce an increasing proportion of the labor force to move out of the (unsk
illed) agricultural sector and into the (skilled) nonagricultural sector. T
he decline in the agricultural labor force leads to an increase in relative
agricultural wages. Both effects benefit the South (Midwest) disproportion
ately since it has more agricultural workers. With the addition of a less t
han unit income elasticity of demand for farm goods and faster technologica
l progress in farming than outside of farming, this model successfully matc
hes the quantitative features of the U.S, structural transformation and reg
ional convergence, as well as several other stylized facts on U.S, economic
growth in the last century. The model does not rely on frictions on interr
egional labor and capital mobility, since in our empirical work we find thi
s channel to be less important than the compositional effects the model emp
hasizes.