In the Fall 1996 issue of this journal, Ho, Chen, and Eng claim that under
independence between the returns of "blocks" the "square root of the sum of
the squares of the blocks' VaRs" is the lower bound of the portfolio's val
ue-at-risk (VaR). The authors prove that this heuristic is correct only und
er the very limiting assumption of normal distributed returns. The correct
lower bound can be above it far non-normal distributions. Thus, the lower b
ound claimed by Ho, Chen, and Eng may lead to underestimation of portfolio
risk.