Aj. Humpert et al., Molecular phylogenetics of Ramaria and related genera: evidence from nuclear large subunit and mitochondrial small subunit rDNA sequences, MYCOLOGIA, 93(3), 2001, pp. 465-477
Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Ramaria and additional related taxa
were examined through phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear r
ibosomal DNA sequence data. Related genera included Clathrus, Clavariadelph
us, Gautieria, Gomphus, Hysterangium, Kavinia and Pseudocolus. Outgroup gen
era included Bondarzewia, Favolus, Ganoderma, Lactarius and Russula. The nu
clear large subunit ribosomal DNA (nuc LSU rDNA) (approx. 610 bp) from 78 c
ollections including 34 Ramaria species was used to test generic, subgeneri
c and selected species concepts for Ramaria. The mitochondrial small subuni
t ribosomal DNA (mt SSU rDNA) (ca 470 bp) from 51 representative holobasidi
omycetes including ten Ramaria species also was used to independently test
the monophyly of the genus Ramaria. Parsimony analyses of both datasets ind
icated that the genus Ramaria was paraphyletic and that several morphologic
ally distinct groups of holobasidiomycetes were derived from ramarioid ance
stors. In the nuc LSU rDNA analyses, Gautieria was nested among the terrico
lous Ramaria species and was closely related to R. subg Ramaria. The nuc LS
U rDNA results also indicated that R subg Laeticolora and R. subg Lentorama
ria formed paraphyletic grades. Ramaria subg Laeticolora was paraphyletic d
ue to the terminally derived R. subg Ramaria/Gautieria clade and a nested G
omphus. Ramaria subg Lentoramaria was paraphyletic due to a nested Clavaria
delphus, Kavinia, and R. abietina of subg Echinoramaria. Both the nuc LSU r
DNA and the mt SSU rDNA analyses demonstrated strong bootstrap support for
the inclusion of the Phallales with the ingroup taxa, but the relationship
of the Phallales to the Gomphales was indeterminate. Selected species conce
pts were also tested (e.g., R amyloidea and R. celerivirescens, and R. arai
ospora and R. stuntzii). These data rejected the monophyly of Ramaria and s
uggested that the ramarioid morphology and lignicolous substrate affinity w
ere ancestral for the Gomphales.