MANAGEMENT OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN THE TIME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Citation
Jw. Lorimer et al., MANAGEMENT OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS IN THE TIME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, The American journal of surgery, 174(1), 1997, pp. 68-71
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00029610
Volume
174
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
68 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(1997)174:1<68:MOCITT>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The best way to detect and manage common duct stones in co njunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not agreed upon at the present time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our experience with choledocholith iasis in a consecutive series of 1,123 cholecystectomies (94% by lapar oscopy) has been reviewed. Suspected duct stones were investigated pre operatively or postoperatively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiograph y (ERC), and if necessary, duct clearance was attempted by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Mo attempt was made to identify choledocholithias is intraoperatively. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography wa s performed in 11% of patients, and 32% of these required ES. The comp lication rate of ERC and ES was 8%, without mortality. Two patients re quired a second operation for missed choledocholithiasis, for a reoper ation rate of 0.2%. CONCLUSION: We believe that primary or secondary o pen surgery is only occasionally necessary for the management of chole docholithiasis. Preoperative ERC and ES for suspected duct stones, wit h the same strategy employed as a salvage for stones presenting after cholecystectomy, was safe and efficient. (C) 1997 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.