This article reports findings from a survey of 257 stare officials involved
in public assistance policymaking in the American states during the early
to mid-1990s. Respondents were asked to comment on the impetus for welfare
reform, on methods employed to gauge public preferences, and on sources of
policy ideas. These officials, including state legislators, social service
agency directors, and senior advisors to governors, revealed a variety of f
orums for gathering public input. Although few respondents affiliated with
elective office reported significant direct electoral challenges on welfare
issues, they often cited constituent contacts regarding welfare reform.