This paper is a contribution to solving the problem of whether reciprocal a
ltruism can emerge and maintain itself in a population of selfish individua
ls. We use an evolutionary game theoretic simulation model (the Social Evol
ution Model) to investigate the relative fitness of two versions of a recip
rocal altruistic trait competing with a defecting trait. One main differenc
e between the Social Evolution Model and most of the models that are known
in this field is that partner selection is straightforwardly built into the
strategies of the players. In most of the models in the literature, partne
r selection is not an Option in the game. Because of this element of forced
play, much attention is given to the ability of strategies to detect cheat
ers and to retaliate. We show that modeling partner selection points to dis
advantages of a preoccupation with cheater-detection and to the importance
of committing oneself to a partner.