As. Allal et al., FEASIBILITY AND OUTCOME OF A PROGRESSIVELY ACCELERATED CONCOMITANT BOOST RADIOTHERAPY SCHEDULE FOR HEAD AND NECK CARCINOMAS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 38(4), 1997, pp. 685-689
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To evaluate toxicity and treatment outcome in patients with h
ead and neck carcinomas treated with a modified bifractionated concomi
tant boost radiotherapy schedule. Methods and Materials: Eighty-five p
atients were treated from February 1991 to October 1995. According to
clinical TN stage 23 tumors were T1, 33 T2, 20 T3, 9 T4, 44 N0, and 41
N1-N3. The primary tumor was located in the oral cavity in 6 patients
, oropharynx in 36, larynx in 19, hypopharynx in 17, and nasopharynx i
n 7. The basic treatment delivered 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, once a day
, to the primary site and both sides of the neck. During the last 3.5
weeks, a boost to the initial gross disease was delivered in 13 fracti
ons of 1.5 Gy each as a second daily fraction in a progressively accel
erated schedule (total dose 69.9 Gy). Eighteen patients had a uni- or
bilateral neck dissection, and 2 an adenectomy before radiotherapy. Th
e median follow-up for the surviving patients was 28 months (range: 3-
61 months). Results: All the patients completed the planned radiothera
py schedule. According to the RTOG scoring system, 57 patients (67%) p
resented with Grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Grade 3 dysphagia was observed
in 20 patients (23.5%). Three patients died during the 3 months follo
wing the treatment. Among 73 patients evaluable for late effects, five
developed Grade 3-4 complications. At 3 years actuarial loco-regional
control was 67% and overall survival was 62%. Conclusions: Although l
onger follow-up is needed to evaluate the definitive results, we concl
ude that this particular concomitant boost schedule is feasible and ap
pears to be effective. While acute toxicity was greater than in monofr
actionated schedules, it was manageable, provided that supportive care
measures were implemented in a timely fashion. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scie
nce Inc.