Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of vasovasostomies perf
ormed in the authors' clinic over 15 years.
Material and methods: Between 1983 and 1998 39 vasovasostomies were perform
ed using a microscopic technique. The medical charts were reviewed and a po
stal survey was sent to 36 of these patients. The patients were invited to
visit the outpatient department and to give semen for analysis and a blood
sample for determination of serum antisperm antibodies and serum follicle-s
timulating hormone. Twenty-five patients filled in the questionnaire and 10
patients were obtained for further semen and serum analyses.
Results: The overall pregnancy rate was 56% (14/25 respondents). Three of t
hese 14 men used an assisted reproduction method with their own ejaculated
sperm. The postoperative patency was recorded in the medical charts only sp
oradically. The age and the interval between the vasectomy and vasectomy re
versal averaged 42 years and 8.6 years, respectively. Those men who could f
ather a child had a somewhat shorter mean obstructive interval than those w
ho failed (8.0 vs 9.3 years), although the difference was not statistically
significant in this small patient sample. The serum follicle-stimulating h
ormone concentrations were normal, with no association with the pregnancy r
ate.
Conclusion: Macroscopic vasovasostomy is an effective means of re-establish
ing fertility in vasectomized men.