D. O'Doherty et H. Willmott, Debating labour process theory: The issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism, SOCIOLOGY, 35(2), 2001, pp. 457-476
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
This paper locates labour process theory in broader sociological debates co
ncerned with the action-structure dualism before examining three broad prog
rammes for research that have emerged in response to the question of subjec
tivity and agency. Whereas the 'orthodox' school tends to re-assert the str
ucturalist and economistic features of Marx, the 'anti-realist' or deconstr
uctionist position invites the abandonment of analysis that has traditional
ly been orientated by the polarities of 'structure' and 'agency'. We identi
fy and develop a third, 'hybrid position' one that is informed by poststruc
turalist insights but does not neglect or reject established traditions of
'modern' sociology and labour process research. Critical examinations of tw
o recent studies of 'subjectivity and the labour process' - Mike Sosteric's
(1996) case study of a night club and Douglas Ezzy's (1997) paper on 'good
work' - are undertaken to show how poststructuralist insights may offer an
instructive way of understanding how subjectivity is co-implicated in the
accomplishment and reproduction of capitalist employment relations.