Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of a first acute renal allograft rejection: Three-year follow-up

Citation
M. Pescovitz et al., Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of a first acute renal allograft rejection: Three-year follow-up, TRANSPLANT, 71(8), 2001, pp. 1091-1097
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
00411337 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1091 - 1097
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1337(20010427)71:8<1091:MMFTTO>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Background, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has previously been shown to be sig nificantly better than azathioprine (AZA) in the treatment of first acute r enal transplant (Tx) rejection by 6 months after initiation of treatment. T his report analyzes the 3-year safety and efficacy data from this cohort of patients. Methods. Renal Tx recipients with a first rejection episode occurring withi n 6 months after a first or second cadaver or living donor Tx were randomiz ed, double-blind, to receive MMF (1.5 g b.i.d., n=113) or AZA (1-2 mg/kg, n =108); both treatment arms also received i.v. corticosteroids (5 mg/kg/day for 5 days) followed by a steroid taper in conjunction with cyclosporine. P atients remained on blinded study medication for 1 year, after which they w ere converted to open-label study medication at the same dosage, All patien ts, including those who terminated early (<3 yr) were followed for patient and graft survival, chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD), and maligna ncy, CRAD was determined by the presence of at least two of the following: a biopsy with chronic rejection, proteinuria > 750 mg/day, or an increase i n serum creatinine >1 mg/dl over baseline. Patients who continued to receiv e the assigned medication were followed for additional rejections, renal fu nction, and adverse events including infections. Results. A total of 67 (59.3%) MMF-treated and 56 (51.9%) AZA-treated patie nts completed the 3-year study; follow-up was available for all randomized patients except one. At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of first subseque nt biopsy-proven or presumptive rejection while receiving study drug was 42 .2% in the MRF-treated and 68.8% in the AZA-treated patients; a difference of 26.6% (95% confidence interval: 13.4-39.9%). At 3 years, 19.6% of all MM F-treated and 24.1% of all AZA-treated patients lost their Tx or had died. Renal function was similar in both groups. The combined end point of CRAD o r Tx loss without CRAD occurred in 23% and 26% of all MMF- and all AZA-trea ted patients, respectively. Leukopenia, diarrhea, and abdominal pain were t he most commonly associated adverse events of MMF treatment. Malignancies ( predominantly cutaneous) occurred in 14.2% of MMF-treated patients and 10.2 % of AZA-treated patients, Three lymphomas occurred in each treatment arm. Conclusion. The addition of MMF at the time of renal Tx rejection reduces t he frequency of subsequent rejections without causing new limiting side eff ects. Although Tx survival was better in the MMF group, comparison with AZA was confounded by the rate of premature terminations in both treatment gro ups.