Irradiation fields and doses in glioblastoma multiforme: Are current standards adequate?

Citation
M. Reni et al., Irradiation fields and doses in glioblastoma multiforme: Are current standards adequate?, TUMORI, 87(2), 2001, pp. 85-90
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
TUMORI
ISSN journal
03008916 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
85 - 90
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-8916(200103/04)87:2<85:IFADIG>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Aims and background: The optimum conventional radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme patients has not been clearly defined by prospective trials. To better characterize a standard radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme, the impact on survival of different fields and doses was analyzed in a retrosp ective single center series. Methods: One hundred and forty-seven patients with glioblastoma multiforme, submitted to biopsy only (n = 15), subtotal (n = 48) or total resection (n = 82) and who completed the planned postsurgical radiotherapy, were consid ered. The median age was 57 years, the male/female ratio 1.5/1, and the per formance status greater than or equal to 70 in 76%. Whole brain irradiation , followed by a boost to partial brain, was used in 75 cases with a whole b rain dose of 44-50 Gy (median, 46) and a partial brain dose of 56-70 Gy (me dian, 60 Gy). Partial brain irradiation alone was used in 72 patients with a dose of 56-70 Gy (median, 61 Gy). Ninety-eight patients received 56-60 Gy (median, 59 Gy) to partial brain whereas 49 patients received 61-70 Gy (me dian, 63 Gy). Results: There was an almost significantly longer survival in patients irra diated to the partial brain alone with respect to those also receiving whol e brain radiotherapy (P = 0.056). Doses > 60 Gy significantly prolonged sur vival (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the impact on survi val of radiation dose was independent of age, performance status, extent of surgery, field of irradiation and the use of chemotherapy. The extent of i rradiation field was not independently related to improved survival. Conclusions: Our retrospective findings suggest that we reflect on the adeq uacy of the current standard irradiation parameters. Well-designed prospect ive trials are necessary to standardize the radiotherapy control group in p atients with glioblastoma multiforme to be compared in phase III trials wit h innovative therapeutic approaches.