Ds. Elliott et al., Does nocturnal deactivation of the artificial urinary sphincter lessen therisk of urethral atrophy?, UROLOGY, 57(6), 2001, pp. 1051-1054
Objectives. To compare nocturnal deactivation with nocturnal activation of
the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) to determine whether nocturnal deact
ivation reduces the risk of urethral atrophy and subsequent recurrent incon
tinence. To the best of our knowledge, no review comparing these two approa
ches has been performed.
Methods. At the Mayo Clinic, all patients are instructed to deactivate thei
r AUS at night; at Baylor, all patients keep their AUS activated all the ti
me. At each institution, a group of consecutive men with comparable severe
urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy were selected;
61 and 46 patients from the Mayo Clinic and Baylor, respectively, were avai
lable for review. All Mayo Clinic patients strictly adhered to nocturnal de
activation of their AUS and all 46 patients from Baylor kept their AUS acti
vated at all times, except during voiding. Each patient was reviewed for th
e long-term risk of subsequent reoperation, especially regarding recurrent
incontinence due to urethral atrophy.
Results. Seventeen (27.8%) of the 61 patients from Mayo (mean follow-up 40
months) required a repeated operation. Of the 17 AUS failures, 6 (35%) were
due to urethral atrophy. Of the 46 patients from Baylor (mean follow-up 28
months), 16 (34.7%) required a repeated operation. Of the 16 AUS failures,
10 (62%) were due to urethral atrophy. Overall, the patients who nocturnal
ly deactivated their AUS had a 10% risk of atrophy-related incontinence com
pared with a 21% risk in the nocturnally activated group.
Conclusions. Although not statistically significant, nocturnal deactivation
appears to decrease the risk of urethral atrophy and recurrent incontinenc
e (10% versus 21%). Nocturnal deactivation should be considered in men who
are dry at night and have sufficient motivation to lessen the risk of ureth
ral atrophy secondary to cuff compression. UROLOGY 57: 1051-1054, 2001. (C)
2001, Elsevier Science Inc.