Two consecutive events transforming the same illusory surface in transparen
t motion (brief changes in direction) can be discriminated with ease, but a
prolonged interference (similar to 500 ms) on the discrimination of the se
cond event arises when different surfaces are concerned [Valdes-Sosa, M., C
obo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transpa
rent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfo
rmance, 26(2), 488-505]. Here we further characterise this phenomenon and c
ompare it to the attentional blink AB [Shapiro, K.L., Raymond, J.E., & Amel
l, K.M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attent
ional blink in RSVP. Journal of Ekxperimental Psychology : Human Perception
and Performance, 20, 357-371]. Similar to the AB, reduced sensitivity (d')
was found in the two-surface condition. However, the two-surface cost was
associated with a reduced N1 brain response in contrast to reports for AB [
Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., & Shapiro, K. (1998). Electrophysiological evidenc
e for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J
ournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6),
1656-1674]. The results from this study indicate that the two-surface cost
corresponds to competitive effects in early vision. Reasons for the discre
pancy with the AB study are considered. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All
rights reserved.