S. Remy et al., Different mechanisms mediate the rejection of porcine neurons and endothelial cells transplanted into the rat brain, XENOTRANSPL, 8(2), 2001, pp. 136-148
In order to investigate the early cellular responses mediating xenograft re
jection in the brain, porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) or porcine fe
tal mesencephalic neurons (PNEU) were transplanted into the striatum of LEW
.1A rats. PAEC were detected with a specific anti-beta1 integrin antibody,
and PNEU with an anti-porcine neurofilament antibody, or an antibody recogn
izing the NeuN antigen. PAEC grafts were massively infiltrated within 24 h
by OX42-positive cells, which may correspond to polymorphonuclear (PMN) cel
ls or macrophages. At that moment, the graft contained numerous cells expre
ssing the inducible isoform of NO-synthase (iNOS). Infiltration by EDI-posi
tive macrophages was effective after three days. The beta1-integrin labelin
g decreased from that time-point to day 7 post-implantation, and vanished a
fter 11 days. Although some OX8-positive cells were present around the graf
t as soon as 3 days after transplantation, cells expressing the T-cell rece
ptor (TCR)-beta chain infiltrated the graft after 7 days and their number r
emained low. A strong, diffuse OX8-and ED1-positive immunoreactive material
remained in the scar up to the third week. In striking contrast, PNEU graf
ts remained poorly infiltrated by OX42- or EDI-positive cells during the fi
rst two weeks. A massive infiltration by macrophages and TCR beta -positive
lymphocytes occurred after 3 weeks. Natural killer (NK) cells were more sc
arce. The inflammation territory enlarged, and blood vessels were overloade
d with macrophages or lymphocytes. Nevertheless, the graft contained NeuN-p
ositive nuclei and neurites harbouring the porcine neurofilament protein. H
ence, rejection was not completed at this time-paint. These results suggest
that the rapid rejection of PAEC is mainly driven by macrophages and possi
bly PMN cells, unlike PNEU, whose rejection is delayed and also involves ly
mphocytes. Differences in immunogenicity of grafted cells and/or patterns o
f production of pro-inflammatory cytokines may account for these contrasted
rejection kinetics.