Symptom validity testing (SVT), a special forced-choice technique, has been
successful in malingering detection and research. It is applicable for rep
orted sensory and cognitive symptoms, with a number of new instruments espe
cially designed for assessing memory complaints. However, even with SVT, th
e conceptual problem of differentiating between malingering, factitious dis
orders, and somatoform disorders (e.g., "hysteria") is not resolved. A case
study is presented in which the reported loss of sensory perception disapp
eared during the assessment.