Purpose: To evaluate the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of switching
from timolol to latanoprost or adding latanoprost to timolol in patients wi
th open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension where IOP is not adequately c
ontrolled with timolol,
Methods: This was a 6-week, double-masked, randomised multi-centre study 53
patients with primary open angle glaucoma, capsular glaucoma, or ocular hy
pertension with an IOP of at least 21 mmHg on current therapy were recruite
d. After a run-in period of at least 2 weeks on timolol, 5 mg/ml twice dail
y, patients were randomised to one of three groups. One group continued on
timolol, one switched from timolol to latanoprost, 50 mug/ml once daily, an
d a third group received latanoprost in addition to timolol, The efficacy w
as evaluated by comparing IOP at 9 AM at baseline and after 6 weeks of trea
tment.
Results: IOP at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (mean +/- SEM) were
24.2 +/- 0.9 and 23.8 +/- 1.0 mmHg (n = 16) for patients continuing on tim
olol, 26.3 +/- 1.2 and 19.6 +/- 1.1 mmHg (n = 17) for patients switching to
latanoprost, and 23.2 +/- 1.0 and 17.5 +/- 0.8 mmHg (n = 17) for patients
with combined treatment. Adding latanoprost to timolol reduced IOP with 5.9
+/- 0.9 mmHg (p < 0.001) and switching from timolol to latanoprost reduced
IOP with 5.0 +/- 0.9 mmHg (p < 0.001), which caused in each group a signif
icant IOP reduction of about 25%.
Conclusions: The effect of latanoprost was additive to that of timolol, and
a good effect on IOP reduction was also achieved by switching from timolol
to latanoprost, suggesting that a switch in many patients is an effective
alternative to combination treatment.