C. Landry et al., Factors affecting the sterility of work areas in barrier isolators and a biological safety cabinet, AM J HEAL S, 58(11), 2001, pp. 1009-1014
Factors affecting the sterility of the work area in barrier isolators and a
biological safety cabinet(BSC)were studied.
A study in a mother-and-child tertiary care teaching hospital in Canada exa
mined the effects of a range of variables on the sterility of work areas in
four barrier isolators and a standard BSC. The Variables consisted of type
of equipment (barrier isolator or BSC), day of the week (Monday through Th
ursday), lime of day (0800-1000, 1000-1200, 1200-1400, and 1400-1600), samp
ling site (16 surfaces and 5 air sedimentation zones), type of product prep
ared (antimicrobial total parenteral nutrient solution, etc.), cleaning pro
cedure (before or after primary cleaning), and level of product preparation
activity (none to intense). A total of 657 surface and air sedimentation s
amples, 327 plated onto Trypticase soy agar (TSA) and 330 onto Sabouraud de
xtrose agar (SAB-D) were taken during a 20-day period.
Thirty-three (5%) of the samples yielded microbial growth when cultured (24
on TSA and 9 on SAB-D). A total of 74 isolates were identified, including
Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Penicillium, Micrococcus, Corynebacterium, and Mu
cor species. Single-variable analysis showed that sampling site, sample typ
e, the lime of day samples were taken, and the types of equipment contribut
ed significantly to microbial growth in-the samples taken.
Several variables were associated with microbial growth in samples from the
work areas of barrier isolators and a BSC. More study is needed to compare
BSCs and barrier isolators with respect to sterility.