Temporal, personal and spatial variability in dermal exposure

Citation
H. Kromhout et R. Vermeulen, Temporal, personal and spatial variability in dermal exposure, ANN OCCUP H, 45(4), 2001, pp. 257-273
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE
ISSN journal
00034878 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
257 - 273
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4878(200106)45:4<257:TPASVI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
A database of dermal exposure measurements (DERMDAT) comprising data from 2 0 surveys was created. The majority of dermal exposure measurements were fr om agricultural settings in which workers' exposure to pesticides was inves tigated. Other data came from studies of workers exposed to polycyclic arom atic hydrocarbons (e.g. coke-oven workers and paving workers) and from stud ies of subjects exposed to complex mixtures (rubber industry). The database contains approximately 6400 observations. Grouping the workers by job title, factory and body location and excluding groups with more than 25% data below the limit of detection, or with less t han two workers with at least two repeats, resulted in 283 groups with 1065 workers and 2716 measurements. Analyses of variability showed median values of the total, within- and betw een-worker geometric standard deviations of respectively 2.55, 1.98 and 1.4 7, strikingly similar to what has been published previously for respiratory exposure, Within-worker variability (S-w(y)2) was in general higher than b etween-worker variability (S-b(y)2) in dermal exposure levels. Agricultural groups of re-entry workers showed very little to no between-worker variabi lity, while industrial groups did show some variability in individual mean exposures (range S-b(y)2 = 0.15-0.29). When the between-body-location compo nent (S-b1(y)2) was also addressed, it turned out to be the most prominent component (median S-b(y)2 = 0.004; median S-w(y)2 = 0.12; median S-b1(y)2 = 0.34). In agriculture the between-body-location component was smaller than in industry. Day-to-day variability in dermal exposure levels appeared to be significant for specific locations, but not for the average of several b ody-locations. Underlying exposure scenarios (transfer and deposition) also played an important role. (C) 2001 British Occupational Hygiene Society. P ublished by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.