Impact of cove-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities

Citation
Rr. White et al., Impact of cove-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities, ANN SURG, 233(6), 2001, pp. 769-777
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034932 → ACNP
Volume
233
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
769 - 777
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4932(200106)233:6<769:IOCBBO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous, image-guided core-needle breast b iopsy (CNBx) and to compare the surgical management of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by CNBx with patients diagnosed by surgical needle-locali zation biopsy (SNLBx). Summary Background Data Percutaneous, image-guided CNBx is a less invasive alternative to SNLBx for the diagnosis of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. CNBx potentially spares patients with benign lesions from unnecessary surgery, although fals e-negative results can occur. For patients with malignant lesions, preopera tive diagnosis by CNBx allows definitive treatment decisions to be made bef ore surgery and may affect surgical outcomes. Methods Between 1992 and 1999, 939 patients with 1,042 mammographically detected le sions underwent biopsy by stereotactic CNBx or ultrasound-guided CNBx. Resu lts were categorized pathologically as benign or malignant and, further, as invasive or noninvasive malignancies. Only biopsy results confirmed by exc ision or 1-year-minimum mammographic follow-up were included in the analysi s. Patients with breast cancer diagnosed by CNBx were compared with a match ed control group of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by SNLBx. Results Benign results were obtained in 802 lesions (77%), 520 of which were in pat ients with adequate follow-up. Ninety-five of the 520 evaluable lesions (18 %) were subsequently excised because of atypical hyperplasia, mammographic- histologic discordance, or other clinical indications. There were 17 false- negative CNBx results in this group; 15 of these lesions were correctly dia gnosed by excisional biopsy within 4 months of CNBx. In two patients (0.9%) , delayed diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ were made at 15 and 19 mont hs after CNBx. Malignant results were obtained in 240 lesions (23%), 220 of which were surgically excised from 202 patients at our institution. Two le sions diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ were reclassified as atypical d uctal hyperplasia and considered false-positive results (0.4%). For maligna nt lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of CNBx for the detection of in vasion were 89% and 96%, respectively. During the first surgical procedure, 115 of 199 patients (58%) diagnosed by CNBx underwent local excision; 194 of 199 patients (97%) evaluated by SNLBx underwent local excision. For pati ents whose initial surgery was local excision, those diagnosed before surge ry by CNBx had larger excision specimens and were more likely to have negat ive surgical margins than were patients initially evaluated by SNLBx. Overa ll, patients diagnosed by CNBx required fewer surgical procedures for defin itive treatment than did patients diagnosed by SNLBx. Conclusions Diagnosis by CNBx spares most patients with benign mammographic abnormaliti es from unnecessary surgery. With the selective use of SNLBx to confirm dis cordant results, missed diagnoses are rare. When compared with SNLBx, preop erative diagnosis of breast cancer by CNBx facilitates wider initial margin s of excision, fewer positive margins, and fewer surgical procedures to acc omplish definitive treatment than diagnosis by SNLBx.