Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous, image-guided core-needle breast b
iopsy (CNBx) and to compare the surgical management of patients with breast
cancer diagnosed by CNBx with patients diagnosed by surgical needle-locali
zation biopsy (SNLBx).
Summary Background Data
Percutaneous, image-guided CNBx is a less invasive alternative to SNLBx for
the diagnosis of nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. CNBx potentially
spares patients with benign lesions from unnecessary surgery, although fals
e-negative results can occur. For patients with malignant lesions, preopera
tive diagnosis by CNBx allows definitive treatment decisions to be made bef
ore surgery and may affect surgical outcomes.
Methods
Between 1992 and 1999, 939 patients with 1,042 mammographically detected le
sions underwent biopsy by stereotactic CNBx or ultrasound-guided CNBx. Resu
lts were categorized pathologically as benign or malignant and, further, as
invasive or noninvasive malignancies. Only biopsy results confirmed by exc
ision or 1-year-minimum mammographic follow-up were included in the analysi
s. Patients with breast cancer diagnosed by CNBx were compared with a match
ed control group of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by SNLBx.
Results
Benign results were obtained in 802 lesions (77%), 520 of which were in pat
ients with adequate follow-up. Ninety-five of the 520 evaluable lesions (18
%) were subsequently excised because of atypical hyperplasia, mammographic-
histologic discordance, or other clinical indications. There were 17 false-
negative CNBx results in this group; 15 of these lesions were correctly dia
gnosed by excisional biopsy within 4 months of CNBx. In two patients (0.9%)
, delayed diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ were made at 15 and 19 mont
hs after CNBx. Malignant results were obtained in 240 lesions (23%), 220 of
which were surgically excised from 202 patients at our institution. Two le
sions diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ were reclassified as atypical d
uctal hyperplasia and considered false-positive results (0.4%). For maligna
nt lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of CNBx for the detection of in
vasion were 89% and 96%, respectively. During the first surgical procedure,
115 of 199 patients (58%) diagnosed by CNBx underwent local excision; 194
of 199 patients (97%) evaluated by SNLBx underwent local excision. For pati
ents whose initial surgery was local excision, those diagnosed before surge
ry by CNBx had larger excision specimens and were more likely to have negat
ive surgical margins than were patients initially evaluated by SNLBx. Overa
ll, patients diagnosed by CNBx required fewer surgical procedures for defin
itive treatment than did patients diagnosed by SNLBx.
Conclusions
Diagnosis by CNBx spares most patients with benign mammographic abnormaliti
es from unnecessary surgery. With the selective use of SNLBx to confirm dis
cordant results, missed diagnoses are rare. When compared with SNLBx, preop
erative diagnosis of breast cancer by CNBx facilitates wider initial margin
s of excision, fewer positive margins, and fewer surgical procedures to acc
omplish definitive treatment than diagnosis by SNLBx.