Patients with Broca's aphasia have long been known to interpret who is doin
g what to whom in certain kinds of comprehension tasks in quite anomalous w
ays. Attempts to explain their observed interpretation patterns have focuse
d on how theta-roles get to be assigned to NPs in a so-called "agrammatic''
patient's representation. These attempts follow one of two basic approache
s. In one approach, it is specified that theta-roles are assigned according
to linear considerations, and in the other approach, it is proposed that t
heta-role assignment is achieved structurally. This review paper argues tha
t the structural accounts are to be preferred to the linear accounts on bot
h conceptual and empirical grounds.