Comparing stimulation-induced pain during percutaneous (intramuscular) andtranscutaneous neuromuscular electric stimulation for treating shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia

Objective: To determine whether percutaneous (intramuscular) neuromuscular electric stimulation (perc-NMES) is less:painful than transcutaneous neurom uscular electric stimulation (trans-NMES) for treating shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia, Design: Double-blind, crossover trial. Setting: University-affiliated tertiary care hospital. Participants: A convenience sample of 10 hemiplegic sub jects with at least 1 fingerbreadth of glenohumeral subluxation. Interventions: All subjects received 3 randomly ordered pairs of perc-NMES and trans-NMES to the supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles of the su bluxated shoulder. Both types of stimulation were optimized to provide full joint reduction with minimal discomfort. Main Outcome Measures: Pain was assessed after each stimulation with a 10-c m visual analog scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire, using the Pa in Rating Index (PRI) scoring method. Subjects were asked which type of sti mulation they would prefer for 6 weeks of treatment. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare median differences in VAS and PRI between perc-NM ES and trans-NMES. Results: Median VAS scores for perc-NMES and trans-NMES were 1 and 5.7, res pectively (p = .007). Median PRI scores for perc-NMES and trans-NMES were 7 and 19,5, respectively (p = .018). Nine of the 10 subjects preferred perc- NMES to trans-NMES for treatment. Conclusion: Data suggest that perc-NMES is less painful than trans-NMES in the treatment of shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia. (C) 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Americ an Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.