Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in Swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age
I. Mejare et al., Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in Swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age, CARIES RES, 35(3), 2001, pp. 178-185
The objective was to assess the influence on the caries rate for the mesial
surface of the first permanent molar (6m) of the caries status of the dist
al surface of the second primary molar (05d) in children from 6 to 12 years
of age. The study design was retrospective and included 374 children with
an average of 5 sets of bite-wing radiographs. The mean age of the children
was 6.7 years when the first bite-wing radiographs were taken and 11.5 yea
rs at the time of the latest radiographs included in the study. The approxi
mal surfaces were classified according to a scoring system: 0 = no visible
radiolucency, 1= radiolucency in the outer half of the enamel, 2 = radioluc
ency in the inner half up to the enamel-dentin border, 3 = radiolucency wit
h a broken enamel-dentin border but with no obvious involvement of the dent
in, 4 = radiolucency with obvious spread in the outer half of the dentin, a
nd score 5 = radiolucency in the inner half of the dentin. The influence of
the status of 05d on the caries rate for 6m (state greater than or equal t
o2) was assessed by using a model for dependence between the two neighbouri
ng surfaces. Presence or absence of approximal caries in the distal surface
of the first primary molars (04d) and/or the mesial surface of the second
primary molars (05m) at the time of eruption of 6m was also related to the
caries rate for 6m. The caries rate for 6m was 15 times higher if 05d had d
eveloped enamel/enamel-dentin border caries (state 2 or 3) compared to a ra
diographically sound 05d (state 0 or 1). No significant increase in the car
ies rate for 6m was found when 05d had deeper unrestored dentin caries than
when 05d had superficial caries (state 2 or 3). Furthermore, for preventin
g caries in 6m, no benefit could be found from restoring an 05d with dentin
caries with amalgam as opposed to leaving the carious lesion unrestored un
til exfoliation. The caries rates for 6m and 05d were 3.4 and 2.7 times hig
her, respectively, in the presence of dentin caries/restoration in 04d/05m
compared to absence of dentin caries in these molar surfaces at the time of
eruption of 6m. In conclusion, the caries rate for 6m depended on the stat
us of 05d and increased 15 times if 05d had enamel/enamel-dentin border car
ies compared to a sound 05d. Deeper unrestored or restored dentin lesions i
n 05d did not result in a higher caries rate for 6m compared with more shal
low carious lesions in 05d. Copyright (C) 2001 S. KargeiAG. Basel.