Neural network-based screening (NNS) in cervical cytology: No need for thelight microscope?

Citation
Mr. Kok et al., Neural network-based screening (NNS) in cervical cytology: No need for thelight microscope?, DIAGN CYTOP, 24(6), 2001, pp. 426-434
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
87551039 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
426 - 434
Database
ISI
SICI code
8755-1039(200106)24:6<426:NNS(IC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Neural network-based screening (NNS) of cervical smears can be performed as a so-called "hybrid screening method, " in which parts of the cases are ad ditionally studied by light,microscope, and " NNS, in which the cytological it can also be used as "pure diagnosis is based only on the digital images , generated by the NNS system. A random enriched sample of 985 cases, in a previous study diagnosed by hybrid NNS, was drawn to be screened by pure NN S, This study population comprised 192 women with (pre)neoplasia of the cer vix and 793 negative cases. With pure NNS, more cases were recognized as se verely abnormal; with hybrid NNS, more cases were cytologically diagnosed a s low-grade. For a threshold value greater than or equal to HSIL. (high-gra de squamous intraepithelial lesions), the areas under the receiver operatin g characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) were 81% (95% CI, 75-88%) for pure NNS vs. 78% (95% CI, 75-81%) for hybrid NNS. For low-grade squamous intraepithe lial lesions (LSIL), the A UC was significantly higher for hybrid NNS (81%; 95% CI, 77-85%) than for pure NNS (75%; 95% CI, 70-80%), Pure NNS provides optimized prediction of HSIL cases or negative outcome, For the detection of LSIL, light microscopy has additional value. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss. Inc.