Dl. Reich et al., Retrograde cerebral perfusion during thoracic aortic surgery and late neuropsychological dysfunction, EUR J CAR-T, 19(5), 2001, pp. 594-600
Objective: Retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) is commonly used in thoracic
aortic surgery, ostensibly to provide metabolic support, maintain cerebral
hypothermia and/or wash out particulate emboli. We tested the hypothesis t
hat RCP would affect neuropsychological outcome in a clinical cohort. Metho
ds: Ninety-four patients undergoing elective thoracic aortic repairs requir
ing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest consented to participate in this st
udy. These patients underwent preoperative neuropsychological evaluation an
d comprise the reference group. Fifty-six of these patients also underwent
neuropsychological evaluation several weeks postoperatively, 12 of whom (21
%) had RCP. The neuropsychological domains tested were attention, processin
g speed, memory, executive function, and fine motor function. A global asse
ssment of impairment, negative neuropsychological outcome (NNO), was define
d as a postoperative decrease in function in two or more neuropsychological
domains for patients with at least three domains tested both pre- and post
operatively (n = 48). The relationship of three potential predictors (RCP,
cerebral ischemia time and patient age) to negative outcomes was analyzed u
sing Wilcoxon two-sample tests, chi (2) tests, Mantel-Haenszel tests and mu
ltiple logistic regression. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: M
emory dysfunction and NNO had strong associations with RCP. This effect rem
ained significant when controlling separately for age and cerebral ischemia
time. Conclusions: The effects of RCP are difficult to distinguish from th
ose of age and prolonged cerebral ischemia time, because complex thoracic a
ortic repairs are associated with advanced age, prolonged cerebral ischemia
and use of RCP, Despite this limitation, these preliminary data indicated
that RCP had no beneficial effect (and most likely a negative effect) upon
cognitive outcome. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.