Long-term care policies and programs in the United States suffer from a maj
or flaw: They are balanced toward a model of nursing home care that, regard
less of its technical quality, tends to be associated with a poor quality o
f life for consumers. This article proposes quality-of-life domains-namely,
security, comfort, meaningful activity, relationships, enjoyment, dignity,
autonomy, privacy, individuality, spiritual well-being, and functional com
petence. It argues that these kinds of quality-of-life outcomes are minimiz
ed in current quality assessment and given credence only after health and s
afety outcomes are considered. Five trends are reviewed that might lead to
a more consumer-centered emphasis on quality of life: the disability rights
movement, the emphasis on consumer direction, the growth of assisted livin
g, increasing attention to physical environments, and efforts to bring abou
t culture change in nursing homes. Building on these trends, the article co
ncludes with strategies to move beyond current stalemates and polarized arg
uments toward forms of long-term care that are more compatible with a good
quality of life.