E. Duzel et al., Comparative electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of neural activation during memory-retrieval, HUM BRAIN M, 13(2), 2001, pp. 104-123
The spatial and temporal characteristics of the brain processes underlying
memory retrieval were studied with both event-related potentials (ERP) and
positron emission tomography (PET) techniques. Subjects studied lists of 20
words and then performed episodic (old/new judgment) or semantic (living/n
onliving decision) retrieval tasks on multiple four-item test lists, each l
asting 10 sec. The PET and ERP measurements at test were assessed in relati
on to both the task (episodic vs. semantic) and the item (old vs, new or li
ving vs. nonliving). Episodic retrieval was associated with increased blood
flow in the right frontal lobe (Brodmann Area 10) and a sustained, slowly
developing positive ERP shift recorded from the right frontopolar scalp. Se
mantic retrieval was associated with increased blood flow in the left front
al (Area 45) and temporal (Area 21) lobes but no clear ERP concomitant. The
two retrieval tasks also differed from each other in the ERPs to single it
ems in an early (300-500 ms) time window. Item-related comparisons yielded
convergent results mainly if the retrieved information was relevant to the
given task (e.g., old/new items during episodic retrieval and living/nonliv
ing items during semantic retrieval). Episodically retrieved old items were
associated with increased blood flow in the left medial temporal lobe and
a transient increase in the amplitude of the late positive component (500-7
00 ms) of the ERP. Semantically retrieved living items were associated with
increased blood flow in the left frontal cortex and anterior cingulate and
a transient late frontal slow wave (700 -1,500 ms) in the ERPs. These resu
lts indicate that the brain regions engaged in memory retrieval are active
in either a sustained or transient manner. They map task-related processes
to sustained and item-related processes to transient neural activity. But t
hey also suggest that task-related factors can transiently affect early sta
ges of item processing. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.