The IVOG (R) feeding station: a tool for monitoring the individual feed intake of group-housed weanling pigs

Citation
Emam. Bruininx et al., The IVOG (R) feeding station: a tool for monitoring the individual feed intake of group-housed weanling pigs, J ANIM PHYS, 85(3-4), 2001, pp. 81-87
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERPHYSIOLOGIE TIERERNAHRUNG UND FUTTERMITTELKUNDE
ISSN journal
09312439 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
81 - 87
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-2439(200104)85:3-4<81:TI(FSA>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Three batches of weanling pigs (total n = 310 pigs) were used in a 34-day e xperiment to validate the use of an IVOG(R) feeding station as a tool for m onitoring individual feed intake of group-housed weanling pigs. An IVOG(R) feeding station for weanling pigs consists of a single-space dry feeder pla ced on a load cell in combination with electronic identification. Data of 1 92 weanling pigs (18 pens) fed by IVOG(R) feeding stations were used to dev elop a protocol for the screening of IVOG(R) data. To assess the quality of the IVOG(R) data, the feed intake per pen computed from the screened IVOG( R) data was compared with the feed intake calculated from feed weighing. To assess the suitability of the use of IVOG(R) feeding stations under practi cal pig husbandry conditions, performance of 96 weanling pigs fed by the IV OG(R) feeding stations was compared with that of 118 weanling pigs that wer e fed using commercial single-space dry feeders (11 pens). Feed intake per pen computed from the IVOG(R) data was similar to the feed intake calculate d from feed weighing (average recovery 101.1%) for all test periods (p > 0. 1). Furthermore, feed recovery did not differ among feeding stations (p > 0 .1). During the first 13 days after weaning, the average daily feed intake (ADFI) of weanling pigs fed by the single-space dry feeders was higher (p < 0.05) than that of weanling pigs fed by the feeding stations. Average dail y gain and gain to feed ratios did not differ (p > 0.1) between both feedin g systems. During the remaining 21 days and averaged over the entire experi mental period, performance did not differ between the feeding systems (p > 0.1). It can be concluded that IVOG(R) feeding stations for weanling pigs a re a suitable tool to monitor individual feed intake of group-housed weanli ng pigs.