Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the occlusal plane inclin
ation of models mounted using 3 different systems for face-bow transfer wit
h the actual occlusal plane inclination as measured on a cephalometric radi
ograph.
Patients and Methods: Twenty-two subjects were enrolled in this study. Thre
e alginate impressions of the maxillary dentition were taken, and 3 stone d
ental models were produced for each subject. Face-bow recordings were obtai
ned on each subject using the SAM Anatomical Face-bow (Great Lakes Orthodon
tics Products, Ltd, Tonawanda, NY), the Erickson Surgical Face-bow (Great L
akes Orthodontics Products, Ltd) and a new technique developed by one of th
e authors (J.G.). For each subject, the dental models were mounted on a SAM
articulator using each of the 3 face-bow recordings. Finally, a lateral ce
phalometric radiograph was obtained for each subject. The occlusal plane in
clination was measured on the models and on the cephalometric radiographs.
Differences among groups were tested using a 1-way analysis of variance. Bo
nferroni test was used for post hoc comparison between different pairs of g
roups.
Results: The average occlusal plane inclination using the SAM Anatomical Fa
ce-bow was 7.8 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees greater than the actual-a difference
that was statistically significant. The mean occlusal plane inclination of
the models obtained using the Erickson Surgical Face-bow was 4.4 degrees /- 2.2 degrees greater than the actual-a difference that was also statistic
ally significant. The mean occlusal plane inclination of the models obtaine
d by the new technique was only 0.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees greater than th
e actual; this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The new mounting technique is more accurate than the conventio
nal SAM Face-bow or the Erickson Face-bow for reproducing the actual occlus
al plane inclination. (C) 2001 American Association of Oral and Maxillofaci
al Surgeons.