Wages may be observed to increase with seniority because of firm-specific h
uman capital accumulation or because of self-selection of better workers in
longer jobs. In both these cases, the upward sloping wage profile in cross
-sectional regressions would reflect higher productivity of more senior wor
kers. If this were true, the observation of an effect of seniority on wages
would depend on the presence of controls for individual productivity. In t
his paper we replicate, using personnel data from a large Italian firm, the
results of the pioneering work of Medoff and Abraham [Quarterly Journal of
Economics (1980); The journal of Human Resources, 15(2) (1981)] in which s
upervisors' evaluations were used as productivity indicators. Since the val
idity of supervisors' evaluations as measures of productivity has been wide
ly criticised, we extend the work of Medoff and Abraham using different dir
ect measures of productivity based on recorded absenteeism and misconduct e
pisodes. Both these indicators and supervisors' evaluation suggest that the
observed effect of seniority on wages does not reflect a higher productivi
ty of more senior workers. Only at the lowest levels of the firm's hierarch
y, the human capital theory contributes to explain the effect of seniority
on wages. At least at all other levels, the explanation of the observed upw
ard sloping profile has to be based on theories in which wages are deferred
for incentive or insurance reasons. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.