Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, and Australia
D. Braddock et al., Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, and Australia, MENT RET D, 7(2), 2001, pp. 115-121
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES RESEARCH REVIEWS
The purpose of this article was to collate evidence to describe where peopl
e with mental retardation or developmental disabilities live in five develo
ped countries: United States, Canada, England, Wales, and Australia. Family
homes are important dwelling places for people with mental retardation. Th
ey are the home of the great majority of children with mental retardation a
nd a considerable proportion of adults with mental retardation. The likelih
ood of placement outside the family home increases with adulthood and progr
essively as people age. Adults with mental retardation live in a wide varie
ty of settings, with formal residential provision frequently dependent on t
he arrangements that the authorities responsible for providing service supp
ort have chosen to make. There has been a considerable move away from accom
modating people in large segregated and geographically isolated institution
s in the countries considered. However, the current range of accommodation
includes much with a distinctively different character to the homes where o
ther citizens live. Many people still live in larger groups than would be o
rdinarily found in typical homes and this may necessitate departure from th
e architectural norm. In all of the countries considered, there has been a
recent trend towards small community settings, compatible with typical hous
ing architecture. This appears furthest advanced in the U.S. but is discern
ible elsewhere. Availability of residential services at a national level va
ries between 100 and 155 places per 100,000 total population. Regional vari
ation within countries is even greater. In no case is the national availabi
lity considered adequate to meet the demand arising from changing need or e
xpectations, (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss. Inc.