This essay provides a critical history of the debate on the Rorschach Inkbl
ot Tests administered to 22 leading figures of the Third Reich who were imp
risoned in Nuremberg in 1945-1946. This debate occurred in two stages. The
question at the heart of the first stage was whether the Nazi leaders were
sane or psychopaths. Despite a strong disagreement concerning the use of th
ese diagnostic labels, there was a surprisingly broad agreement on the actu
al substance of the discrepant diagnoses. Divisions of opinion, however, ar
ose from political dissension in two areas: the nature of liberal democraci
es and authoritarian regimes, and the possibility of trust in any political
leadership. The second stage was marked by an ideology of convergence aime
d at establishing a consensual "scientific truth" on the Nazi Rorschachs. T
hus. the politics of the second phase were motivated by interests and ambit
ions internal to the field of Rorschach expertise, rather than by extraneou
s political anxieties.