Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry

Citation
Y. Barnes-holmes et al., Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry, PSYCHOL REC, 51(2), 2001, pp. 287-308
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD
ISSN journal
00332933 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
287 - 308
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-2933(200121)51:2<287:ETAADT>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The main purpose of the present study was to determine whether exemplar tra ining would readily facilitate the transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. Sixteen children, aged between 4 and 5 years, were employed across four experiments (i.e., 4 children each in Experiments 1 to 4). In Experiment 1, subjects were first trained to name two actions and two objec ts by demonstrating listening, echoic, and tacting behaviors (e.g., hear na me --> point to object, hear name --> say name, see object --> say name, re spectively). This name training served to establish that each of the subjec ts could clearly discriminate the experimental stimuli. Subjects were then trained in an action-object conditional discrimination using the previously named actions and objects (e.g., when the experimenter waved, choosing a t oy car was reinforced, and when the experimenter clapped, choosing a doll w as reinforced). Subjects were then reexposed to the name training, before e xposure to a test for derived object-action symmetry relations (e.g., exper imenter presents toy car --> child waves and experimenter presents doll --> child claps). Across subsequent sessions, a multiple-baseline design was u sed to introduce exemplar training (i.e., explicit symmetry training) for t hose subjects who failed the symmetry test. Experiment 2 replicated Experim ent 1, except that the name retraining (between the conditional discriminat ion training and symmetry test) was removed. Experiment 3 replicated Experi ment 1, except that subjects were trained to tact all of the actions and ob jects during conditional discrimination training and symmetry testing. Expe riment 4 replicated Experiment 1, except that the trained and tested relati ons were reversed (i.e., train object-action, test action-object relations) . Across the four experiments, 13 out of 16 subjects failed to show derived object-action (Experiments 1-3) or action-object (Experiment 4) symmetry u ntil they received explicit symmetry training. Overall, the data are consis tent with Relational frame Theory.