The main purpose of the present study was to determine whether exemplar tra
ining would readily facilitate the transformation of function in accordance
with symmetry. Sixteen children, aged between 4 and 5 years, were employed
across four experiments (i.e., 4 children each in Experiments 1 to 4). In
Experiment 1, subjects were first trained to name two actions and two objec
ts by demonstrating listening, echoic, and tacting behaviors (e.g., hear na
me --> point to object, hear name --> say name, see object --> say name, re
spectively). This name training served to establish that each of the subjec
ts could clearly discriminate the experimental stimuli. Subjects were then
trained in an action-object conditional discrimination using the previously
named actions and objects (e.g., when the experimenter waved, choosing a t
oy car was reinforced, and when the experimenter clapped, choosing a doll w
as reinforced). Subjects were then reexposed to the name training, before e
xposure to a test for derived object-action symmetry relations (e.g., exper
imenter presents toy car --> child waves and experimenter presents doll -->
child claps). Across subsequent sessions, a multiple-baseline design was u
sed to introduce exemplar training (i.e., explicit symmetry training) for t
hose subjects who failed the symmetry test. Experiment 2 replicated Experim
ent 1, except that the name retraining (between the conditional discriminat
ion training and symmetry test) was removed. Experiment 3 replicated Experi
ment 1, except that subjects were trained to tact all of the actions and ob
jects during conditional discrimination training and symmetry testing. Expe
riment 4 replicated Experiment 1, except that the trained and tested relati
ons were reversed (i.e., train object-action, test action-object relations)
. Across the four experiments, 13 out of 16 subjects failed to show derived
object-action (Experiments 1-3) or action-object (Experiment 4) symmetry u
ntil they received explicit symmetry training. Overall, the data are consis
tent with Relational frame Theory.