Mammalian play: Training for the unexpected

Citation
M. Spinka et al., Mammalian play: Training for the unexpected, Q REV BIOL, 76(2), 2001, pp. 141-168
Citations number
137
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00335770 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
141 - 168
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-5770(200106)76:2<141:MPTFTU>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
In this review, we present a new conceptual framework for the study of play behavior, an hitherto puzzling array of seemingly purposeless and unrelate d behavioral elements that are recognizable as play throughout the mammalia n linage. Our major new functional hypothesis is that play enables animals to develop flexible kinematic and emotional responses to unexpected events in which they experience a sudden loss of control. specifically, we propose that play functions to increase the versatility of movements used to recov er from sudden shocks such as loss of balance and falling over, and to enha nce the ability of animals to cope emotionally with unexpected stressful si tuations. To obtain this "training for the unexpected," we suggest that ani mals actively seek and create unexpected situations in play through self-ha ndicapping; that is, deliberately relaxing control over their movements or actively putting themselves into disadvantageous positions and situations. Thus, play is comprised of sequences in which the players switch rapidly be tween well-controlled movements similar to those used in "serious in "serio us" behavior and self-handicapping movements that result in temporary loss of control. We propose that this playful switching between in-control and o ut-of-control elements is cognitively demanding, setting phylogenetic and o ntogenetic constraints on play, and is underlain by neuroendocrinological r esponses that produce a complex emotional state known as "having fun." Furt hermore, we propose that playa is often prompted by relatively novel or unp redictable stimuli, and is thus related to, although distinct from, explora tion. We present 24 predictions that arise from our new theoretical framewo rk, examining the extent to which they are supported by the existing empiri cal evidence and contrasting them with the predictions of four major altern ative hypotheses about play. We argue that our "training for the unexpected " hypothesis can account for some previously puzzling kinematic, structural , motivational, emotional, cognitive, social, ontogenetic, and phylogenetic aspects of play. It may also account for a diversity of individual methods for coping with unexpected misfortunes.